<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Al-Qaeda and Numerology in the Maghreb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://middleeast.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/12/25/al-qaeda-and-numerology-in-the-maghreb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://middleeast.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/12/25/al-qaeda-and-numerology-in-the-maghreb/</link>
	<description>The World Affairs Blog Network</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://middleeast.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/12/25/al-qaeda-and-numerology-in-the-maghreb/comment-page-1/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 22:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middleeast.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/12/25/al-qaeda-and-numerology-in-the-maghreb/#comment-494</guid>
		<description>I agree.  My point with the 11s is that if the population was making a big deal about it, it would behoove the terrorist groups to follow suit, to maximize the dread.  Of course, random terrorism is effective as well.  

But I agree with your main point.  It is hard to maintain control over groups.  There are always foot soldiers, but a lot of people want glory and fame, and strong personalities chafe against each other.  Plus, the logistics of a multi-country organization are incredibly difficult, and maintaining communication and formulating plots could make these groups a cogent whole in name only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  My point with the 11s is that if the population was making a big deal about it, it would behoove the terrorist groups to follow suit, to maximize the dread.  Of course, random terrorism is effective as well.  </p>
<p>But I agree with your main point.  It is hard to maintain control over groups.  There are always foot soldiers, but a lot of people want glory and fame, and strong personalities chafe against each other.  Plus, the logistics of a multi-country organization are incredibly difficult, and maintaining communication and formulating plots could make these groups a cogent whole in name only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory D. Johnsen</title>
		<link>http://middleeast.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/12/25/al-qaeda-and-numerology-in-the-maghreb/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory D. Johnsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://middleeast.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/12/25/al-qaeda-and-numerology-in-the-maghreb/#comment-493</guid>
		<description>Your final point, about bringing splinter groups under the umbrella of al-Qaeda is, to me, the more interesting of the two.  I don&#39;t believe the first - 11&#39;s in Algeria is worth much.  But while it may be possible to attract splinter groups to a more centralized decision-making structure, I'm not sure organizations and groups of this nature can be very successful maintaining control over such groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your final point, about bringing splinter groups under the umbrella of al-Qaeda is, to me, the more interesting of the two.  I don&#39;t believe the first - 11&#39;s in Algeria is worth much.  But while it may be possible to attract splinter groups to a more centralized decision-making structure, I&#8217;m not sure organizations and groups of this nature can be very successful maintaining control over such groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
